Driving Politics
Home >Camera Enforcement > Speed Cameras > Scottsdale Photo Radar Insured for $5 Million 
Print It Email It Tweet It

Scottsdale Photo Radar Insured for $5 Million
Worried about lawsuits, Scottsdale, Arizona wants a multi-million dollar insurance policy to protect its new speed camera proposal.

Insurance policy
Scottsdale, Arizona's proposed digital speed camera network will be covered by a liability insurance policy as a condition of state approval. Australian camera vendor Redflex has suggested a policy worth $5 million would be sufficient, but city officials told the East Valley Tribune that they didn't think it would be enough. Scottsdale would be left paying the remainder of judgments exceeding the insurance amount.

"We really shouldn't be taking on extra liability," said Councilman Bob Littlefield.

If adopted on October 25, Redflex will make $8.4 million off its new contract with the city. Redflex will install and operate the photo radar devices on the Loop 101 freeway and continue to operate its red light and speed camera program on behalf of Scottsdale.

The insurance makes sense if one considers that camera problems have cost jurisdictions around the world millions in the past twelve months:
  • In September, Union City, California refunded $1 million in red light camera tickets.
  • In September, South Australian lawmakers fearing a potential $10 million in speed camera refunds have proposed a retroactive reduction in the speed limit.
  • In June, a number of UK speed camera errors led to refunds worth over $900,000.
  • In May, Cape Town, South Africa refunded $2.3 million in tickets.
  • In March, Devon, Canada refunded $700,000 in photo radar tickets because the operator was not qualified.
  • In December 2004, Victoria, Australian officials refunded $21 million in speed camera tickets after a 1975 Datsun was sent a ticket for driving an impossible speed.

Source: Freeway photo radar could breed lawsuits (East Valley Tribune (AZ), 10/13/2005)

Regional News:
Other news about Scottsdale, Arizona

Permanent Link for this item
Return to Front Page

Related News
Ohio Supreme Court Upholds Anti-Speed Camera Law

Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Another Speed Camera Challenge

Ohio Appeals Court Upholds Photo Ticket For Violating Implicit Speed Limit

Ohio Appeals Court Restores Class Action Against Speed Cameras

Motorists Sue Over DC Speed Camera Trap

View Main Topics:

Get Email Updates
Subscribe with Google
Subscribe via RSS or E-Mail

Back To Front Page

Front Page | Get Updates | Site Map | News Archive | Search | RSS Feed Driving politics