TheNewspaper.com: A Journal of Driving and Politics
Home >Camera Enforcement > Red Light Cameras > Weekly Standard Expose on Camera Enforcement 



Related News
California: Red Light Camera Companies Ignore Reporting Law

Sierra Vista, Arizona To Vote On Banning Traffic Cameras

Study Reveals Reason For Conflicting Red Light Camera Studies

Two Ohio Cities To Vote On Traffic Camera Bans

Redflex Unlawful Termination Lawsuit Kicked Back To State Court



View Main Topics:


Get Email Updates
Subscribe via RSS or E-Mail


Back To Front Page
Print It Email It

10/28/2004
Weekly Standard Expose on Camera Enforcement
The five-part expose on camera enforcement by Weekly Standard author Matt Labash.

Matt LabashMatt Labash writes a five part series exposing the major flaws in the red light and speed camera enforcement programs in the District of Columbia, Maryland, and other locations. A must read.

Article Excerpt:
Curious about some of Retting's crash conclusions, the National Motorists Association's Jim Kadison secured accident data for the red-light-camera intersections Retting used in his latest Oxnard report. Retting had estimated that the use of red-light cameras had resulted in a tiny 3 percent increase in rear-enders at all signalized intersections. But after expanding the definition of an intersection to include 100 feet into the approaches, where rear-end accidents would logically occur, Kadison found that during the time of Retting's study, rear-end crashes at red-light camera intersections increased from 18 (before installation) to 156, for a total rear-end accident increase of 767 percent.
Source: Inside the District's Red Lights (Weekly Standard, 4/1/2002)

Permanent Link for this item
Return to Front Page



Front Page | Get Updates | Site Map | News Archive | Search | RSS Feed
theNewspaper.com: A journal of the politics of driving
thenewspaper.com