TheNewspaper.com: Driving Politics
Home >Police Enforcement > Drunk Driving Laws > North Dakota Lawmakers Consider Banning DUI Roadblocks 
Print It Email It Tweet It

North Dakota Lawmakers Consider Banning DUI Roadblocks
North Dakota state House passes legislation prohibiting the use of drunk driving checkpoints.

Rick Becker
The North Dakota House of Representatives does not want police to be able to set up roadblocks to detain and question motorists without any reason to believe they are engaged in wrongdoing. Under legislation passed last month by a 79 to 14 vote, driving under the influence (DUI) checkpoints would no longer be allowed in the state. The measure is now before the state Senate Judiciary Committee.

"The cold hard fact... is that sobriety checkpoints are terrible at apprehending drunk drivers," state Representative Rick Becker (R-Bismarck), the bill's sponsor, said. "They fail miserably at apprehending. There's really not much debate on that aspect."

Becker pointed to a study that showed 63 percent of individuals with a blood alcohol content above the legal limit of 0.08 were able to slip through a roadblock undetected. Becker insisted that roving patrols of police officers on the lookout for drunks behind the wheel had much higher success rates.

"You take the same number of personnel and the same number of manhours, and you apply them in a saturation patrol, they will apprehend the same number of drunk drivers as those sitting around, twiddling their thumbs at a sobriety checkpoint," Becker said. "I can tell you the officers on the ground feel it's a waste of time, quite boring and ineffective."

The states of Alaska, Idaho, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon, Rhode Island, Texas, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming ban DUI roadblocks even though the 1990 US Supreme Court case Michigan v. Sitz upheld the constitutionality of the practice. The Michigan Supreme Court justices disagreed with their federal counterparts and banned their use under the state constitution. While Becker has Fourth Amendment concerns about roadblocks, his primary motivation is ending their use on the grounds of practicality.

"So when someone wants to talk about 'keeping a tool in the toolbox' if it keeps one drunk driver off the road... Wrong," Becker said. "When we take limited manhours and put them in a sobriety checkpoint, you do get that one drunk driver off the road. True. However, you did it at the cost of a saturation patrol which would have gotten three drunk drivers off the road. Therefore, your decision to use that crappy tool left two drunk drivers on the road."

A copy of the bill is available in a 50k PDF file at the source link below.

Source: PDF File House Bill 1442 (North Dakota Legislative Assembly, 2/25/2019)



Permanent Link for this item
Return to Front Page


Related News
North Dakota Lawmakers Consider Banning DUI Roadblocks

US Supremes To Decide Whether Passed Out Drunks Have Given Implied Consent

Scotland: Lowering Drunk Driving Limit Did Nothing For Safety

Tennesse Court Rejects Sovereign Citizen DUI Defense

Federal Court OKs Charging Sober Drivers With DUI




View Main Topics:

Get Email Updates
Subscribe with Google
Subscribe via RSS or E-Mail

Back To Front Page


Front Page | Get Updates | Site Map | News Archive | Search | RSS Feed
TheNewspaper.com: Driving politics
TheNewspaper.com