Driving Politics
Home >Camera Enforcement > Speed Cameras > Speed Camera Challenge Sent to Ohio Supreme Court 
Print It Email It Tweet It

Speed Camera Challenge Sent to Ohio Supreme Court
A federal judge asked the Ohio Supreme Court to rule on the ability of cities to operate photo enforcement programs without state sanction.

Ohio Supreme Court
A US District Court Judge has asked the Ohio Supreme Court to rule on a question pivotal to the use of photo enforcement in the state. Judge David D. Dowd wrote the court to ask if a city on its own authority can issue a civil fine for something defined in state law as a criminal offense.

The question comes from two cases before Dowd that argue speed cameras and red light cameras undermine the due process and other protections found in the US and Ohio state constitutions. Dowd, a federal judge, had earlier ruled in a case that cities could do so. A county judge disagreed and issued a ruling based on state law rejecting Dowd's reasoning and striking down Girard's speed camera program.

In response, Dowd has nullified the sections of his ruling dealing with Akron's authority under state law to issue civil fines for traffic violations and has asked the Ohio Supreme Court to resolve the dispute.

Source: Speed cams are back in court (Akron Beacon Journal (OH), 12/5/2006)

Regional News:
Other news about Akron, Ohio

Permanent Link for this item
Return to Front Page

Related News
UK Report Finds Variable Speed Limits Dangerous

Baltimore, Maryland Restarts Faulty Traffic Camera System

Incoming French President To Continue Anti-Motorist Policies

Ohio Lawmaker Challenges Expanded Speed Camera Use

Iowa Court Rejected IIHS Expert Witness

View Main Topics:

Get Email Updates
Subscribe with Google
Subscribe via RSS or E-Mail

Back To Front Page

Front Page | Get Updates | Site Map | News Archive | Search | RSS Feed Driving politics