TheNewspaper.com: Driving Politics
Home >Police Enforcement > Drunk Driving Laws > Judge Finds Virginia DUI Law Unconstitutional 
Print It Email It Tweet It

8/12/2005
Judge Finds Virginia DUI Law Unconstitutional
A county judge in Virginia says the state DUI law presumes the guilt of defendants.

Drunk driver
Fairfax County, Virginia General District Court Judge Ian O'Flaherty has thrown out at least two cases that presumed a driver was intoxicated merely because his blood alcohol level was over 0.08 after being stopped. His ruling, delivered from the bench and not available in writing, found that Virginia law effectively presumed the automatic guilt of the defendant and was designed to ensure conviction. The law denies the ability of defendants to present scientific evidence that could suggest that some individuals are intoxicated at different blood alcohol levels and that one's blood alcohol content can rise as time passes. The judge believes this runs afoul of Francis v. Franklin, a 1985 Supreme Court ruling, that says all elements of a crime must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

The California Supreme Court, however, takes a different view and supports the very concept of designing laws to increase conviction rates. In 1994, the court ruled in People v. Bransford that California's DUI law, "will increase the likelihood of convicting such a driver, because the prosecution need not prove actual impairment... Adjudication of such criminal charges will also require fewer legal resources, because fewer legal issues will arise. And individuals prosecuted under such a statute will be less likely to contest the charges."

Prosecutors in Virginia are now avoiding taking any drunk driving cases to Judge O'Flaherty.


Article Excerpt:
Patrick O'Connor, president of the northern Virginia chapter of Mothers Against Drunk Driving, said he was not aware of any other Virginia judges who have reached a similar conclusion. O'Flaherty's decision "undermines the efforts of the police and prosecutors to enforce the DWI laws, puts drunk drivers back behind the wheel and potentially denies justice to victims of drunk drivers," said O'Connor, who has requested a meeting with O'Flaherty. O'Flaherty, who has a reputation as a fairly tough judge among defense lawyers, turned down a request for an interview.
Source: Judge Declares Va. Drunken Driving Laws Unconstitutional (Associated Press, 8/11/2005)

Regional News:
Other news about Fairfax County, Virginia



Permanent Link for this item
Return to Front Page


Related News
Ohio Supreme Court Clears Strip Club In Drunk Stripper Accident

Iowa Supreme Court Upholds Ban On Driving While High

Ohio Court Upholds Right To Warn Of Roadblocks

Virginia Supreme Court Says A Private Parking Lot Is Not A Highway

Iowa Supreme Court Nullifies DUI Arrest Fees




View Main Topics:

Get Email Updates
Subscribe with Google
Subscribe via RSS or E-Mail

Back To Front Page


Front Page | Get Updates | Site Map | News Archive | Search | RSS Feed
TheNewspaper.com: Driving politics
TheNewspaper.com