![]() |
| Home >Police Enforcement > Taxes and Tolls > Virginia Lawmaker Vows to Stop Raid on Transportation Fund |
Related News UK: London Congestion Tax Accused of Greenwashing Texas Governor Saves Toll Road Promotional Campaigns US House Wants More Transit Spending, Fewer Tolls Wyoming Plans to Toll Interstate 80 Fitch Ratings Forecasts the Need for Massive Toll Increases View Main Topics: ![]() Subscribe via RSS or E-Mail Back To Front Page |
12/13/2007 Virginia Lawmaker Vows to Stop Raid on Transportation FundVirginia state delegate proposes constitutional amendment to stop the raid on transportation funding. A Virginia lawmaker is continuing his quest to stop his state's legislative raid on the gas tax and other user fees paid by motorists. Delegate Bob Marshall (R-Manassas) has spent a decade trying to pass an amendment to the state constitution limiting the ability of the legislature to use taxes on motorists to balance the general budget. This year, he came close to succeeding."Voters want politicians to keep their word," Marshall wrote. "A 'trust' fund should be just that. Our transportation tax dollars have been diverted for non-transportation purposes over the past twelve to fourteen years to the tune of roughly $1.2 Billion." Earlier this year, both the state House and Senate passed versions of the proposed amendment, but an attempt to reconcile differences between the two bodies failed. With next year's legislative session focused on abuser fees and other transportation funding issues, Marshall is hopeful his plan will finally make it through the process. Specifically, the amendment would declare various transportation funds as permanent and separate. This means that the General Assembly could pass a law to change how money enters the fund, but once there the money could only be spent on "financing, acquiring, constructing, improving, maintaining, and operating transportation systems in the Commonwealth, and all purposes incidental thereto." The General Assembly could temporarily borrow from a fund with a two-thirds vote, but the money would have to be repaid within four years -- with interest. Marshall noted that between 1999 and 2005, the legislature increased its spending by 120 percent, far beyond the increase in population and inflation. "It is unjust for government to keep treating taxpayers as bottomless ATM machines," Marshall wrote. Marshall's amendment would, if adopted by the legislature, be put on an upcoming election ballot. It would then become part of the state constitution if approved by a majority of voters. Article Excerpt: HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 18 |
|
Front Page | Get Updates |
Site Map |
News Achive |
Search | theNewspaper.com: A journal of the politics of driving |
![]() |