Home >Camera Enforcement > Red Light Cameras > Albuquerque, NM Cameras Declare City Buses a Nuisance

Related News Illinois Lawmakers Push Red Light Camera Restrictions Second Texas City Initiates Traffic Camera Referendum Texas: Red Light Camera Company Blocks Referendum Florida: Early Data Suggest City Traffic Cameras Ineffective Massachusetts: Red Light Cameras Proposed to Fight Deficit View Main Topics: Camera Enforcement    Speed Cameras    Red Light Cameras    Revenue from Cameras    Camera Accuracy    Engineering/Signals Police Enforcement    Random Checkpoints    Speed Limits/Traps    Tickets and Cash    Seizure/Confiscation    Parking Tickets    Taxes and Tolls    Drunk Driving Laws Miscellaneous Issues    Miscellaneous    Hypocrisy    Bad Policy and Injustice    Propaganda    New Technologies    Privacy Issues The Revolt    Protests    Camera Destruction Subscribe via RSS or E-Mail Back To Front Page

8/28/2006 Albuquerque, NM Cameras Declare City Buses a Nuisance Red light cameras in Albuquerque, New Mexico declare public buses a public nuisance. Bus drivers sue city. Albuquerque, New Mexico's red light camera system operates on a legal fiction that vehicles, not drivers, are responsible for running red lights. Attorney Paul Livingston argues that this setup "provides ridiculous results" when the city's ordinance declares its own vehicles a public nuisance. Livingston represents six city bus and van drivers who have banded together to challenge Albuquerque's red light camera program because it docked their pay $100 after a camera accused the public bus they had been driving of being a nuisance. Johnny Aguilar, Anthony Chavez, Yvonne Dougherty, Virginia Ramirez, Greg Montoya and John Sanchez maintain that they have been falsely accused and deprived of their constitutional right to due process because they were neither presented with the evidence of wrong-doing, nor any opportunity to challenge it. Livingston filed a class action lawsuit last Thursday arguing that under the city's own logic, the owner, not the driver of the vehicle is responsible, which means in the case of city buses, Albuquerque itself is solely responsible for the fines. The class action seeks include any city employee who had a pay deduction without the opportunity for a hearing. Livingston filed a separate suit challenging the process set in place for ordinary citizens. "We also object to the 'hearings' because there is only a city hearing officer -- who effectively works for the police department and the mayor -- and none of the rights one would have in a court," Livingston told TheNewspaper. "The camera is given preclusive effect. Albuquerque's original red light camera ordinance has already been successfully challenged and modified. Initially, the city charged anyone challenging a fine a "hearing fee" of $50, even if they were found to be innocent. After the ACLU filed a lawsuit last year, the city revised its ordinance and dropped the fee. The full text of the lawsuit is available in a 602k PDF file at the source link below. Source: Class Action Complaint (Attorney Paul Livingston, 8/24/2006) Regional News: Other news about Albuquerque, New Mexico Permanent Link for this item Return to Front Page

Front Page | Get Updates | Site Map | News Achive | Search | theNewspaper.com: A journal of the politics of driving