Home >Police Enforcement > Tickets and Cash > Virginia Circuit Court Defends Speeding Ticket Tax

Related News Utah DOT: No Downside to 80 MPH Speed Limit Increase Florida May Put Loud Stereo Tickets on Driving Record Hawaii Supreme Court Questions Laser Speed Gun Accuracy Study: West Virginia Traffic Cops Target Innocent Minorities Road Safety Group Argues for Return of Rational Speed Limits View Main Topics: Camera Enforcement    Speed Cameras    Red Light Cameras    Revenue from Cameras    Camera Accuracy    Engineering/Signals Police Enforcement    Random Checkpoints    Speed Limits/Traps    Tickets and Cash    Seizure/Confiscation    Parking Tickets    Taxes and Tolls    Drunk Driving Laws Miscellaneous Issues    Miscellaneous    Hypocrisy    Bad Policy and Injustice    Propaganda    New Technologies    Privacy Issues The Revolt    Protests    Camera Destruction Subscribe via RSS or E-Mail Back To Front Page

8/13/2007 Virginia Circuit Court Defends Speeding Ticket Tax A Henrico County, Virginia Circuit Court judge upholds the constitutionality of the speeding ticket tax. Henrico County, Virginia Circuit Court Judge L.A. Harris, Jr. today defended the state's "civil remedial fees" that add a $1050 mandatory tax, on top of an existing $2500 maximum penalty, for speeding offenses of 15 MPH over the limit in a 65 zone (fee details). Harris overturned the August 2 ruling of a general district court judge (view ruling) in the same county that found the fees violated the equal protection clauses of the state and federal constitutions. Judge Harris focused on the inability of Virginia to collect fees from out-of-state motorists and the fact that dangerous drivers are more likely to be Virginians as sufficient reasons to impose a different punishments on residents and non-residents convicted of the same offense. "Possibly, the legislature in contemplating Virginia Code Section 46.2-206.1, rationally decided to exclude non-residents in this civil remediation fee legislation because the costs of collecting on a judgment outweighs any benefits with respect to out-of-state motorists," Judge Harris wrote. "...It logically follows that Virginians make up a greater percentage of dangerous drivers than do non-residents since Virginians make up the greater percentage of drivers on Virginia's highways." "The court finds that there is a conceivable rational basis for this legislation's classifications and holds Virginia Code Section 46.2-206.1 constitutional," Judge Harris concluded. Judge Harris remanded the case to the general district court which will be forced to collect the fees once again. The decision does not affect the city of Richmond where another lower court judge also ruled the fees unconstitutional.

Front Page | Get Updates | Site Map | News Achive | Search | theNewspaper.com: A journal of the politics of driving