Home >Camera Enforcement > Red Light Cameras > Sacramento Requires Admission of Guilt Before Red Light Camera Challenge

Related News New Mexico Bans Traffic Cameras From State Roads California: Red Light Camera Refunds Reach $3.1 Million Florida: Red Light Camera Lobbyist Fails To Register Louisiana Lawmaker Proposes Local Votes For All Traffic Camera Programs Washington: Federal Judge Saves State Camera Program View Main Topics: Camera Enforcement    Speed Cameras    Red Light Cameras    Revenue from Cameras    Camera Accuracy    Engineering/Signals Police Enforcement    Random Checkpoints    Speed Limits/Traps    Tickets and Cash    Seizure/Confiscation    Parking Tickets    Taxes and Tolls    Drunk Driving Laws Miscellaneous Issues    Miscellaneous    Hypocrisy    Bad Policy and Injustice    Propaganda    New Technologies    Privacy Issues The Revolt    Protests    Camera Destruction Subscribe via RSS or E-Mail Back To Front Page

12/21/2006 Sacramento Requires Admission of Guilt Before Red Light Camera Challenge Sacramento, California denies the right of a trial by written declaration to anyone misidentified by a red light camera. The Sacramento, California Superior Court now requires anyone seeking to challenge a red light camera ticket in writing to essentially admit a main component of guilt -- and pay the fine -- before that challenge will even be heard. California law allows defendants to file a Trial by Written Declaration using a series of standard forms established by the Judicial Council of California. Such trials allow motorists visiting from out-of-state or distant cities to have a chance at defending their driving record. Sacramento has, on its own initiative, began requiring the use of an unapproved form (view form) before any challenge can be heard. The "Statement of Identification Re: Automated Enforcement Citations" states the following: "Without admitting guilt, I stipulate that I was the driver of the vehicle pictured in the automated enforcement photograph." Drivers who are misidentified by the machine would be unable to sign the form and consequently denied their right under California law to a trial by written declaration. The editor of Highwayrobbery.net discovered the form and contacted the Sacramento court. He was told the written challenge, "Would not even reach the courtroom if the TRL/I-16 form was not signed."

Front Page | Get Updates | Site Map | News Achive | Search | theNewspaper.com: A journal of the politics of driving